What's in the Skies This Month

 

May - 2007


meteor showers

  

There are no major or moderate meteor showers this month.

 

Tips on how to watch meteor showers

 


THE NAKED EYE PLANETS

 

Mercury

Mercury is going to be quite easy to observe throughout September, the best opportunity presenting itself in very bright dusk skies only 30 minutes after sunset through the first two weeks of September.  Since the elusive innermost planet is just past its greatest elongation from the sun you might spot it right on the WNW horizon if binoculars are used.  The only way that you might find it is to observe with an unobstructed western horizon and begin scanning about 30 minutes after sunset, right along the horizon from WEST toward NW.

Venus

The brightest of the planets is now an "evening star" and rising just after the sun a bit later each evening throughout September.  Watch as this beautifully bright planet slowly attains a higher altitude above the western horizon each night this month.  At magnitude minus 4.8 Venus is the brightest object in the sky except for the sun and moon.   In a telescope, Venus grows nearly double during September and presents a "gibbous phase", nearly fully illuminated as seen from Earth.

Mars

Mars is about to leave us for about two years, now very low in the sky at sunset and setting at the end of astronomical twilight in the western sky.  Mars is tiny when viewed in telescopes, and appears as a reddish "star" just to the left (south) of brilliant Venus on September 1st and to the right (north) of Venus by September 16th.

 

Jupiter

Mighty Jupiter still looms bright in evening skies, south of overhead for northern latitudes as the skies darken this September.  The planet has been moving eastward in retrograde motion the past month, but look for this to stop and the large yellow orb will appear to reverse its course this month and appear to once again move eastward through the distant stars.  The largest of all solar system planets, Jupiter is poised beautifully for low power wide field telescopes in the "handle of the teapot" of Sagittarius, amidst the rich stars near the center of our own Milky Way Galaxy.

 

 

Saturn

After hiding in the glare of the sun during solar conjunction (Sept. 4), the magnificent ringed planet once again makes its debut in morning skies in late September.  Look for a beautiful pairing of the waning crescent moon and bright Saturn just as dawn breaks about one hour before sunrise on the morning of September 27, when the two will be very close together on the eastern horizon.  Saturn's rings are now nearly edge-on as seen from Earth, angled only four degrees and shrinking.  By winter the edge-on incredibly thin rings will be so aligned to Earth that only the largest telescopes will be able to detect them at over 800 million miles distant.


phases of The moon

 

                                  

                                       Sept. 3             Sept. 11            Sept. 18           Sept. 25

 

 


sky watch news

 

See Trio of Planets at Sunset
By Joe Rao - SPACE.com Skywatching Columnist

The planet Venus passed conjunction with the sun on June 9 and is now emerging into view in the western evening sky. But it will be a long and tedious process. Even by the end of September this planet will still very low at dusk.

Look for Venus just as evening twilight fades, but don't wait too long, for it will set only about an hour after sunset. Scan just above the western horizon about 20 to 30 minutes after the sun goes down. Binoculars will certainly help you pick out Venus' silvery spark from the still-bright sky. As the season grows cooler Venus will slowly rise higher, until it shines as a brilliant "evening star" in the twilights of winter.

But Venus is currently not alone, for also nearby are the planets Mercury and Saturn.

Over the past week these three planets have been clustered rather closely together. Unfortunately, their close proximity to the sun caused these planet bunchings to be visible only with difficulty against the bright backdrop of evening twilight. They are still relatively close together this week, although all three are so very low to the western horizon and so deeply immersed in the bright sunset glow that it is debatable that — aside from Venus — that the other two planets will be observable.

Your best bet is to use binoculars and scan near the western horizon about 15 to 30 minutes after sunset.

Swap in Mars

In September, Saturn disappears into the fires of sunset and is replaced in the planet trio by Mars. So it will then be Venus, Mercury and Mars that will spend much of September tightly grouped together. Unfortunately, their proximity to the sun will continue to be a problem, so they'll continue to be visible only with difficulty against the bright backdrop of twilight.

Using binoculars and scanning the horizon somewhat to the south of due west about 15 to 30 minutes after sunset on Sept. 1, you just might be able to pick up Venus, Mercury and Mars forming a right triangle. And below and to the left of this planet trio will also be a narrow crescent moon just 2.1 days past new.

Viewers in the southern U.S. will have a bit of an advantage in that this group will appear a bit higher above the horizon.

Planet shuffles

On Sept. 7, the Venus-Mercury-Mars grouping will resemble an isosceles triangle, with the Mars-Mercury and Mars-Venus sides measuring about 2.5 degrees in length and the Mercury-Venus side about 4 degrees. And located about 10 degrees (roughly the width of your fist held at arm's length) to the upper left of the triangle will be Spica, the brightest star of the constellation Virgo.

Venus and Mars will be separated by only 0.3 degree (less than the apparent width of the moon) on Sept. 11. If you can locate Venus with binoculars in the twilight, Mars will be situated just below and to the left of Venus. Mars will appear only 1/174 as bright as dazzling Venus, so don't expect to see it right away.

The next evening, Venus is in conjunction with Mercury, but they're more widely separated at 3.6 degrees; Mercury will appear below and to the left of Venus. At magnitude +0.2, Mercury is much brighter than Mars, but still only 1/44 as bright as Venus. And creeping in from the east is Spica, about 7 degrees to the upper left of the three planets.

Come Sept. 18, Venus, Mercury and Mars will form an equilateral triangle, whose sides are 4 degrees in length. And Spica now becomes a part of this array, sitting only a few degrees to the left of the triangle. Whether you'll actually be able to see it, or the even fainter Mars against the backdrop of the bright twilight sky, however, is debatable.

But to have three planets and a bright star crammed into a relatively small spot in the sky does not happen very often, so I would urge you to give it a try.


Drilling Into Alien Oceans
By Lee Pullen - Astrobiology Magazine

Some of the most interesting places in our solar system are also the most difficult to reach.

Areas hidden under thick layers of ice such as the polar caps of Mars, Saturn's moon Enceladus and Jupiter's moon Europa are prime examples. Drilling through ice on Earth is complicated enough, but on another world the task becomes almost impossible.

The notion of exploring thick sheets of ice isn't new. Probes built and used in the 1960s were strictly Earth-bound, tested in places like Greenland and Antarctica, and the theory behind them was fairly simple.

A long and thin probe penetrates straight down into the ice. A drill on the tip cuts through the ice, scientific equipment in the main body records data and a long cable trails out behind, all the way up to surface equipment. Heavy and complex equipment is needed on the surface to provide the vast amount of power needed by the large drill, which rules it out for all but the most ambitious missions to other worlds.

A different and more modern method of drilling uses a hot drill tip to melt ice, rather than cut through it.

One such probe, called Cryobot, was recently tested in Antarctica. As the drill tip uses heat to melt ice, the probe sinks deeper and deeper. Melting sounds good in theory, but if the probe hits something embedded deep in the ice, like a large rock, it will get stuck. Unable to melt through, the mission would come to an end.

The best of both worlds

Peter Weiss is a scientist experienced in the field of sub-sea robotics. Together with his colleagues from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University and the Institut fuer Weltraumforschung in Graz, Austria, he has devised a novel way of combining drilling and melting methods. The prototype "thermal drill" system they put together excelled in tests, as detailed in the July 2008 issue of the journal Planetary and Space Science. Armed with a series of blades and heaters in the tip, the thermal drill could be the answer to exploring below the ice on distant worlds.

But how does it work? Weiss explains, "Our thermal drill is like a 'classical' melting probe, equipped with two propellers that drill into the ice. We mechanically open up the hole in the ice, and by this move the ice particles backwards where they will be melted. The slurry of water and ice will be pushed backwards by the weight of the probe."

Weiss's thermal drill combines the best of drilling and melting techniques. "One advantage of melting is that you can produce heat directly to melt through the ice, so there are no losses due to the translation into mechanical power," he says. As for the drill encountering layers of dust or other material that cannot be melted through, Weiss says that "Integrating a drilling mechanism will avoid your melting probe from simply getting stuck into a layer of sand while penetrating the ice - a scenario likely on the planet Mars, for example. A hybrid thermal drill will be able to penetrate even layers that cannot be melted."

The heat created also has the useful side-effect of sterilizing the probe, an essential consideration when exploring places where no one has been before. The environment should be kept pristine because contamination from the probe itself could ruin any experiments to such for certain chemistry or even signs of life. The constant production of heat also keeps the scientific equipment warm enough in very cold environments to work effectively.

Destined for the solar system?

Many areas of our solar system are ideal candidates for thermal drill exploration.

Says Weiss, "This study was done targeting the planet Mars and Jupiter's moon Europa. But since then spectacular new knowledge has been gained on worlds like Enceladus or even Titan where scientists speculate about sub-surface oceans."

Weiss and his colleagues have so far tested their prototype thermal drill using large blocks of ice in a lab. Testing the drill under vacuum conditions to simulate alien environments is a logical next step. They'll also want to test just how deep the probe could delve.

Despite high hopes for the thermal drill, Weiss isn't sure whether one will feature on any upcoming probes. He says, "ESA and NASA were discussing a future mission to icy Europa, but it is uncertain if there will be a landing or impacting probe onboard. But sending an orbiter without lander to Europa would be like going to a candy shop without bringing money to spend."


NASA Envisions Huge Lunar Telescope  
By Jeremy Hsu - Staff Writer/Space.com

Telescope mirrors made from lunar dust could help realize dreams of stargazing from the far side of the moon.

Creating gigantic lunar telescopes would normally carry an astronomical price tag, but NASA researchers used a mix of epoxy, simulated lunar dust and carbon nanotubes to demonstrate how to use materials already found on the moon.

"You can go to the moon with a few buckets, and build something far larger than anything a rocket can carry," said Peter Chen, a physicist at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.

Orbiting vs. moon-based

Astronomers have argued about which is better in the future: building additional orbiting space telescopes such as Hubble or setting them up on the moon. Both types of telescopes would be beyond the interference of Earth's atmosphere, although the moon has the added advantages of being a stable platform with a far side shielded from Earth's cluttered radio background. On the other hand, getting to the moon represents more of a challenge than simply launching a space telescope.

Astronauts erect a telescope on the Moon, an artist's concept. Credit: NASA

However, the debate so far has been "limited by launching from the ground," Chen told SPACE.com, because Earth's gravity places both size and cost limits on what rockets can carry into space or to the moon.

The solution: Get much of the needed building material from the moon itself. Chen had already started working with epoxy and carbon nanotubes to create "smart" materials that can flex or change shape when an electric current passes through, but ended up adding simulated lunar dust called JSC-1A Coarse Lunar Regolith Simulant to the mix.

Chen used the resulting lunar concrete as the foundation of a foot-long disk, and poured more plastic epoxy on top of it. Then he spun the mirror at a constant speed that formed the epoxy into a parabolic, slightly bowl-like shape as it hardened. The mirror's finishing touch came with a thin layer of reflective aluminum applied inside a vacuum chamber.

Making a Hubble-sized mirror would require bringing 130 pounds (60 kg) of epoxy to the moon with 3 pounds (1.3 kg) of carbon nanotubes and less than 1 gram of aluminum, according to Chen's calculations. Meanwhile, 1,300 pounds (600 kilograms) of lunar dust could provide the bulk of the material. The moon's lack of atmosphere also suits the vacuum conditions needed to make the mirror.

Base considerations

Astronomers may imagine telescope mirrors half the size of a football field, but realizing such dreams depends heavily on whenever NASA returns human explorers to the moon and sets up a moon base.

Other challenges include getting the necessary manufacturing equipment to the moon, such as the spinning table on which the mirror gets created. Future astronauts would also have to ensure that none of the free-floating lunar dust contaminates the mirror.

"It's a great idea in principle, but nothing is simple on the Moon," said James Spann, physicist heading the Space and Exploration Research Office at Marshall Space Flight Center, in a NASA statement.

Chen and his colleagues will try to scale up their demonstration by creating 1.64-foot (0.5 meter) and 3.28-foot (1 meter) mirrors using the simulated lunar dust. They also plan to figure out ways to hone the quality of the finished mirror's surface, and are already speculating about ways future explorers and robots could build even larger telescope mirrors on the moon — perhaps within an impact crater.

"It's totally out-of-the-box, but it's fun to think about," Chen said.


 

For more information on Sky Watch opportunities please go to www.space.com

 

 
PARTIES & EVENTS  |  EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS  |  SPACE HAPPENINGS  |  SPACE FUN  |  CONTACT US
©2004 SpaceTime, Inc. - Website by SpaceTime, Inc. and Mike Waid & Associates, Inc.